
Printed from www.thesudburystar.com web site Wednesday, January
18, 2006 - © 2006 The Sudbury Star
Rebuilding the
military
Our Opinion
Tuesday, January
17, 2006 - 11:00
Editorial - In 2002, a Senate committee recommended
Canada wrap up its UN and NATO operations abroad within six months and halt all
overseas missions for two years while the federal government undertook the
rebuilding the Canadian Forces. The committee’s rationale was simple: Decades of
chronic underfunding, lack of direction and outdated equipment had reduced the
Armed Forces’ effectiveness. Rather than continue to stretch our military beyond
its limits, it was time to rebuild it into a formidable force with a
mission.
Four years later, the state of Canada’s Armed Forces is again an
issue. Every political party accepts Canada’s military as an essential
instrument of both Canada’s national identity and foreign policy. It’s also true
that Canadian personnel have acquitted themselves brilliantly over the years
under difficult conditions made worse by inadequate government
support.
And so, breathing new life into the Armed Forces its people,
technology, equipment and even mandate is no longer an option, it’s an
imperative. All that’s left is to determine how.
The Liberals promise to
build on the 3-D model of defence, diplomacy and development unveiled in the
February budget and April’s international policy statement. It promises $13
billion over five years for the Canadian Forces to buy new helicopters, planes
and other equipment. Foreign aid goes up $3.4 billion over five years, focused
on disease eradication in Africa and intervening in major world crises.
The Conservatives have pledged $5.3 billion over five years to help buy
large, heavy-lift aircraft such as the C-17, $2 billion over eight years to
build a military base to protect the Arctic and new bases in the
Maritimes.
The Conservatives would also double the 200-member Disaster
Assistance Response Team (DART) that was so effective in helping
earthquake-stricken Pakistan.It would also revive a 650-member Airborne
Regiment, disbanded in the 1990s after some of its members discredited
it.
The NDP promises to improve the welfare of military personnel around
the world, but is short of specifics and costs. Its main focus is to boost
foreign aid by adding more to the $500-million increase it wrestled from the
Liberals in the last federal minority budget.
The NDP also wants to
increase foreign-aid spending to 0.7 per cent of GDP, from the current 0.3 per
cent. It also calls for more federal spending to target the eradication of AIDS,
tuberculosis and malaria.
The Liberals and Conservatives take a
similarly balanced approach to boosting military capability at home and abroad.
The key difference is the Conservative plan leans heavily toward buying billions
of dollars worth of cargo planes, while the Liberals vow to spend more on
foreign aid. That’s where the Liberal plan rises to the top.
To be sure,
the Liberal record on military spending has been spotty at best. The Liberals
wasted hundreds of millions of dollars on helicopters and diesel submarines that
have proven useless. Its plans for the future, however, are balanced and
responsible and offer the most promise for building a Canadian Armed Forces that
can again take on a leadership role in UN and NATO
operations.
ID-
141310
©
2006 ,
Osprey Media. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.